Everything is worn out and negative in a car is a source of revenue for the state, regions and communities. Think about it: The car is cumbersome
(more cumbersome) and occupies space to park it must pay a fee for the space is committed. Right. So maybe it encourages people to leave the car and go out on foot. So why municipalities are always looking for places to build new parking lots?
The car pollution and dirty air. It 's true that less soiled than once, but it is equally true that we use much more than in the past. Some municipalities do charge for entering the city, as if the car outside the city refrain from being harmful. The famous Milan's Congestion Charge has not served to reduce the levels of pollution, but generated very high income to the coffers of City Hall for permits issued, but also on the infringements committed by users struggling with the procedures and systems are not always comprehensible and accessible.
The car is strong, dall'autovelox and then fined, but if you can not stop before driving injures and kills people and who is overwhelmed. E 'right to pay in order to cover the costs of compensation of persons who are injured or the families of the victims. But why should I pay the State a tax of 12.5% \u200b\u200bfor RCAuto a policy that appears to be one of the most expensive in Europe?
to mention the nasty habit of burning gasoline car that is still burdened by excise duty due to disasters dating back to the mists of time. This is one of the most annoying chapters of the economic policy of the '70s, the real, unique and original policy of "hands in his pockets Italians' love for someone today repeat.
The list goes on: the contribution to the waste oil for disposal of tires and other hazardous parts such as batteries that Italians love to leave the fields or woods.
not get me wrong: it is okay to pay for access to those who want to go downtown, huddled part of the costs for the disposal of substances harmful to those who used them and pay insurance premiums for themselves and protective potential victims of road .
The question is rather: are we so sure that the institutions are truly committed to reducing car traffic if they are aware that since there are fewer cars in circulation, also decreases the cash flow to their please?
What alternatives could offer a bike that does not pollute, that does not generate radioactive waste and if the thin tires that would normally take place until you see the canvas, not to be strong and therefore can not be fined, do not consume anything that costs a lot in mining, transportation, refining and distribution with all the taxes that accumulate from one step to another, who does not occupy space, even if many still do not want to see in the courts (see my post "how much shame on those two wheels "). Well what can you get away from a cyclist if you do not hold out for an ambush was fine because on the sidewalk? At least that. Perhaps that explains the reason why in Italy bicycle lanes are being built.
0 comments:
Post a Comment